| Confessions
of a Bandwagon Fan
June
1, 2003
by Chelan David
I
am proud to admit I am one of the most despised of all
breeds: the bandwagon fan. Actually, I prefer the term
'sports capitalist.' Give me a team that wins and I will
invest my devotion in them until the next hot offering
comes around.
Long before day trading caught on, I was moving my allegiance
between teams like they were inflated internet stocks.
Growing up outside Kansas City I jumped on the biggest
bandwagons of the era: the Boston Celtics and Dallas Cowboys.
An early convert to the what-have-you-done-for-me-lately
mentality, I was much happier to root for Larry Bird and
Tony Dorsett than the two doormats from my backyard, the
pathetic Kansas City Kings and the hapless Chiefs. Fortunately,
I was able to adopt a couple of local teams as well, the
Royals – who were playoff regulars in the late ‘70s
and early ‘80s – and the Kansas Jayhawk basketball
team.
Of course, I deserted the Royals years ago – and
I didn’t even wait for George Brett’s retirement
in ‘93. Early this season I happily jumped back
on the bandwagon hitched to the Royals’ 9-0 start.
But the Royals will probably fade, so I’m not about
to give up my seat on the Seattle Mariner bandwagon –
especially with my newly adopted city’s team in
first place in the wild AL West.
My fickleness does have some boundaries. I will never
shift my allegiance to the despised Lakers or Steelers.
Of course, anything can happen. The Yankees were at the
top of my list of condemned teams until I jumped on and
off their bandwagon in the mid-90s. I lived in New York
from 1994-96, and couldn’t resist the siren’s
song of an evolving dynasty in pinstripes.
And you know what? I had a blast. That’s the best
thing about bandwagonning: every season you’re a
winner. My chronic club-hopping has allowed me to unabashedly
root for Isaiah Thomas’ Bad Boy Pistons one year
and their rival, the Chicago Bulls, the next year. I cheer
for the Broncos if they’re hot and the Raiders if
they’re not. Sacrilegiously, I stopped bleeding
Royal blue and cheered for the Bronx Bombers.
If I had grown up in an earlier generation perhaps I would
feel a stronger connection to my local teams. But in the
free agent era why should I be loyal to players and coaches
who have about as much connection with their franchises
as J-Lo does with her old block?
I am a little more faithful in rooting for college teams.
True, NCAA football and basketball are nearly as money-driven
as pro sports, but it’s a lot easier to be loyal
when the majority of the players stick around for four
years and the teams don’t pick up and move every
time another city offers to finance a new stadium. I have
followed my beloved Jayhawks in hoops for nearly my entire
existence – although it hasn’t hurt that they
are the third winningest team in college basketball history
and have been to six Final Fours since 1986.
As for the Jayhawk football team – I claim no association.
Other than the idyllic scenery, the only time it’s
worth $10 to see a game in Lawrence’s half-empty
Memorial Stadium is when Nebraska or Oklahoma are in town.
I am certainly not the only turncoat. I remember one game
in the mid-’80s when the Oklahoma juggernaut was
pounding the Jayhawks by about 50 points late in the final
quarter and the KU cheerleaders were gathered around Brian
Bosworth – hounding the hunky linebacker for autographs.
I’ll start supporting Kansas football when they
start winning. Call me a fair-weather fan if you like,
but I call myself a smart consumer. I’m not going
to buy tickets to a theater production if nobody in the
cast can act. I’m not going to continue visiting
a restaurant if the food sucks. If fans continue to blindly
flock to games regardless of performance, the powers that
be will see no reason to improve the product. Look at
the Chicago Cubs.
There’s an adage that says if you associate with
winners you will become a winner yourself. Check back
in a couple years and I’ll tell you if it’s
true.
(Chelan
David is a volunteer staff writer for 2 Walls Webzine)
|