| One
Last Question
March
2003
by
David Brown
Are
we at war yet? Forgive me, but I haven't been watching
CNN lately. I'm too busy studying the NCAA bracket. Can
you believe Texas Tech got left out? Is it just because
they hate Bobby Knight? I mean, if Saddam Hussein and
Jacques Chirac put together a team in the Big 12, went
18-12 in the nation's toughest conference, and took Oklahoma
to overtime in the conference tourney semis, they'd be
in, wouldn't they?
Back to the war. Since we've reached the point of no turning
back, I have one last question. And this is the 10 billion
dollar question that has NEVER BEEN ASKED!! But in my
sense of duty to country and a deep-seeded cynicism toward
this whole affair and the Administration in general, I
must put forth: What if we can't find Saddam?
Let's be honest, folks. Despite our overwhelming military
superiority, it's no lock that we're just going to waltz
into the presidential palace in Baghdad, brush past a
couple of admin assistants and slap the cuffs on the Mustachioed
Menace like he is the CEO of some scandal-riddled savings
and loan. The entire country exists for the sole purpose
of keeping him safe and secure. There's bound to be more
than just a revolving bookcase that leads to a secret
passageway to the garage and a getaway car.
We still haven't tracked down bin Laden, and we've been
scouring the globe like starving rats looking for him
for 18 months. If Hussein can get out of the country,
using his countless look-alikes and boyish charm, he may
disappear forever.
Of course there are few places in the world that would
welcome Saddam Hussein with open arms. But something tells
me there is enough anti-American sentiment in the world
these days where anyone who professes to hate us as much
as the Iraqi president could find a couch to crash on
for at least a couple of weeks.
Maybe our government knows more than they are telling
us. (Please, for the love of God, let them know a whole
hell of a lot more than they are telling us.) Maybe they
have a fool-proof plan for capturing Saddam, making it
nearly impossible for him to escape the swift kick of
justice. Alright, Rumsy, we'll give you the benefit of
the doubt. Surely we wouldn't have come this far, surely
we wouldn't have flouted the UN and much of the world,
surely we wouldn't be ready to throw the switch on an
entire country if we didn't know for certain that we could
accomplish our number one goal without any chance of anything
short of complete and total success.
For to go in there and not get Saddam would be absolute
political ruin for the United States, and particularly
for George W. Bush and his entire family. The Bush name
would be synonymous with failure-"He couldn't get
Saddam," would follow around Bushes I and II in perpetuity,
in much the same manner as "Lewinsky" haunts
Clinton, "Watergate" haunts Nixon, and "Big
Fat Guy" haunts Taft.
President
Bush himself would become a marked man as notorious and
hated as the man he now hunts. Americans would rally and
riot all night every night in front of the White House
demanding his resignation or his forcible removal from
power. The same Supreme Court that granted him Executive
Authority would strip it from him like a hunter skinning
a deer on the side of the road after a fresh kill. The
world would unite against us even our staunchest
allies would run screaming from our failure, suddenly
emboldened to question our every move throughout the last
100 years. Our position as the dominant global superpower
would turn black with gangrene, morphing into the face
of a tyrannical empire the bane of all existence
that must be stopped at any and all costs.
Of
course if we capture Saddam, all of this can be avoided.
So again, let's be clear. We have a terrific plan for
getting this guy, right? There's no way he could ever
slip through our fingers, right? If there's any hesitation
or reticence on this point, pull back our troops, call
off the dogs, go back to the UN and the drawing table
and start over.
(David
Brown is a volunteer staff writer for 2 Walls Webzine)
|